Nonprofit Wash. State Carriers Face Attack on Surplus

Witnesses from groups such as the Association of Washington HealthcarePlans and the Washington Association of Health Underwriters have argued during hearings on the proposal that the proposal could give for-profit carriers an unfair advantage and could weaken carriers' finances at a time when they may face challenges with implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), according to a summary prepared by members of the state Senate legislative staff.

Dr. Roger Stark, a health policy watcher, has written in an analyst posted by the Washington Policy Center, Seattle, that the proposal would contradict existing Washington state law, by conflicting with a statute indicating that accumulating capital over the amount required by risk-based capital requirements is desirable.

"The health insurance industry is based on assuming risks. No one can predict future health care catastrophes," Stark says. "Health insurance reserves are extremely fragile. Deterioration of the stock and bond markets could quickly lower a health insurance company’s reserves by 15% to 20%. A natural disaster or mass emergency could lower its reserves by 20% to 25% in one day."

Because nonprofit health insurance carriers lack ready access to capital markets, they need bigger reserves and more surplus than for-profit carriers do, Stark says.
 
"The insurance commissioner’s proposal to lower non-profit insurance carriers’ reserves through state legislation would place all policy holders at risk for financial catastrophe," Stark says.
 
Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.