Filed Under:Health Insurance, Individual Health

High Court hears Oxford Health arbitration arguments

The U.S. Supreme Court (AP image/Dana Verkouteren)
The U.S. Supreme Court (AP image/Dana Verkouteren)

U.S. Supreme Court justices seem skeptical about how a health insurer is interpreting an arbitration clause in a health care provider network contract.

The court heard oral arguments Monday in Oxford Health Plans L.L.C. vs. Florida (Case Number 12-135), a case that could affect many companies' ability to avoid becoming the target of "class arbitration" actions.

"Why should we rewrite our standard of review to accommodate your client's error?" Sotomayor asked Seth Waxman, the lawyer speaking for Oxford. "Because that's really what you're asking us to do."

Waxman suggested that the court had decided otherwise in the Stolt-Nielsen ruling.

Featured Video

Most Recent Videos

Prospects not listening to voice mail? Arrange a phone date


Redesigning your phone life is more important than finding the “best words” for a voice mail in today’s culture.

Behind the scenes with Vicki Gunvalson [VIDEO]


In this exclusive interview, Vicki Gunvalson shares how she built a $15 million a year annuity business by planning for...

Regulator: Market may need to reinvent LTCI


Cioppa says Maine's governor wants to spur the creation of better products.

Dementia: It's more than Alzheimer's


An association calls for policymakers to remember lesser-known neurodegenerative conditions.

Related resources

More Resources


Power your business with up-to-the-minute insurance news, analysis, and best practices from LifeHealthPro Daily eNewsletter – FREE.

Power your business with LifeHealthPro Daily eNewsletter – FREE.

Enter a valid email address.
Nichole Morford

Nichole Morford
Managing Editor

Thank you for subscribing to LifeHealthPro Daily!

Check Out More eNewsletters Now! Close

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.