Filed Under:Annuities, Variable

Prudential’s VA charge is credit negative for company

Last Wednesday, Prudential Financial Inc. (Baa1 stable) announced that it would take a “below-the-line” GAAP pre-tax charge of $1.7 billion, predominantly because of lower-than-expected lapses on its variable annuity block. The charge is credit negative for the company because lower lapses will lead to higher economic costs on its guaranteed benefits.

Under GAAP accounting, the value of a guaranteed minimum withdrawal (GMWB) uses market assumptions, much the way financial options are valued. Given the low interest rate environment, this results in Prudential using a very low long-term account growth assumption to value its variable annuity-related guarantees. Although lower lapses in a rising market environment may end up providing greater profitability than higher lapses would, this is not the case in a declining market environment. Lower-than-expected lapse rates during adverse equity markets and low interest rate environments — when the GMWB benefits are most valuable for contract holders and most costly for insurers — will meaningfully hurt insurers’ variable annuity product profitability.

US life insurers’ experience since the global financial crisis highlights the inherent challenge of estimating policyholder behavior regarding options embedded in variable annuity contracts with guaranteed living benefits. Although insurers regard equity market declines as the biggest risk in variable annuity contracts with living benefits such as GMWBs, most insurers effectively hedge equity market risk via derivatives. That leaves the less easily hedged and more unpredictable policyholder behavior, including lapses, being a key driver of the profitability of these popular products.

Data has shown that insurers priced many of these products with lapse and utilization assumptions that were less conservative than actual experience so far. In addition to Prudential, AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (insurance financial strength Aa3 negative) and ING US Inc.’s life insurance companies (whose insurance financial strength ratings are A3 stable) incurred reserve charges of more than $1 billion each for adverse policyholder behavior. At AXA Equitable, lapses and partial withdrawals were lower than the company expected. At ING, lapse rates overall were lower than the company expected, resulting in additional reserves. Other insurers have taken charges of lesser amounts because of policyholder behavior that deviated from their expectations, including MetLife, Inc. (insurance financial strength Aa3 negative).

Featured Video

Most Recent Videos

Behind the scenes with Vicki Gunvalson [VIDEO]


In this exclusive interview, Vicki Gunvalson shares how she built a $15 million a year annuity business by planning for...

Regulator: Market may need to reinvent LTCI


Cioppa says Maine's governor wants to spur the creation of better products.

Dementia: It's more than Alzheimer's


An association calls for policymakers to remember lesser-known neurodegenerative conditions.

Protesters Disrupt WellPoint Annual Meeting


Hecklers call for more disclosures of information about political contributions.

Related resources

More Resources


Power your business with up-to-the-minute insurance news, analysis, and best practices from LifeHealthPro Daily eNewsletter – FREE.

Power your business with LifeHealthPro Daily eNewsletter – FREE.

Enter a valid email address.
Nichole Morford

Nichole Morford
Managing Editor

Thank you for subscribing to LifeHealthPro Daily!

Check Out More eNewsletters Now! Close

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.