Filed Under:Your Practice, Regulatory

Court denies NAFA in DOL fiduciary rule case

Department of Labor fiduciary rule survives first challenge

Judge Moss reasoned that NAFA was given adequate notice that the Department was considering regulating FIAs under the BIC exemption.
Judge Moss reasoned that NAFA was given adequate notice that the Department was considering regulating FIAs under the BIC exemption.

The National Association for Fixed Annuities has lost its challenge to the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule.

In a decision issued today in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Randolph Moss denied NAFA’s motions for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment.

Among other things, NAFA claimed DOL violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it shifted the regulation of fixed indexed annuities to the rule’s Best Interest Contract Exemption. In the proposed version of the rule, FIAs were scheduled for regulation under the less restrictive Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24.

In shifting FIAs to the BIC exemption in the final rule, NAFA argued industry was not given adequate notice to comment on the implications, as the APA requires.

Related: FIAs to take a hit next year, courtesy of DOL fiduciary rule

But Judge Moss cited case law showing that a final rule “need not be the one proposed” in the rulemaking process.

“It is enough that the final rule constitute a logical outgrowth” of the proposed version, wrote Moss.

Moss reasoned that NAFA was given adequate notice that the Department was considering regulating FIAs under the BIC exemption when it explicitly sought comments on whether annuities were adequately regulated in the proposal.

NAFA argued the proposal gave “no inkling whatsoever that the Department was considering moving FIAs from PTE 84-24 to the BIC.”

But Moss ruled that NAFA’s reading of the proposal, and DOL’s request for comment on the viability of how annuities were treated, was “not tenable.”

“The Department expressly requested comment on its decision to ‘continue to allow IRA transactions involving’ fixed indexed annuities ‘to occur under the conditions of PTE 84-24,” wrote Moss.

“That is, it (DOL) asked whether fixed indexed annuities should be grouped under PTE 84-24 or not,” added Moss. “And, if there were any doubt on this, it would be put to rest by the fact that NAFA, along with other industry groups, provided comments on that very issue.”

Full analysis of the ruling will follow.

For full DOL rule coverage, visit the LifeHealthPro Fiduciary Resource Center.

Originally published on BenefitsPro. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Related

D.C. court likely to uphold fiduciary rule in NAFA case

An ERISA expert says the line of questioning from Judge Randolph Moss suggested he will uphold the Labor Department's fiduciary...

Featured Video

Most Recent Videos

Related resources

More Resources

Comments

Power your business with up-to-the-minute insurance news, analysis, and best practices from LifeHealthPro Daily eNewsletter – FREE.

Power your business with LifeHealthPro Daily eNewsletter – FREE.

Enter a valid email address.
Close
Nichole Morford

Nichole Morford
Managing Editor

Thank you for subscribing to LifeHealthPro Daily!

Check Out More eNewsletters Now! Close

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.